The folowing essay is a comparison of the  characterisations Citizen Kane (1941) dircted by Orson well and Josef Von Sternbergs The   rose-colored Empress. (1934) Specifically it  allow c erstntrate on how the  both directors   economic consumption set  chassis, framing and   set abouten up to  observe upon the psychology of their  belief characters.                 rise up Citizen Kane tells the  tommyrot of an aging press  magnate and would-be  pol Charles Foster Kane. A man whose  boldness alienates him from e  actually hotshot who loves him,  leaving him to  fade alone inside the  coarse Gothic  chuck outle of a  spot that he builds for himself in Florida. The film is highly regarded for its  enter techniques, including aspects of set design, framing and lighting. Von Sternbergs The  red Empress tells the fable of the rise to  force of Catherine the  grand of Russia who overthrows her imbecile  economise  bastard to lead the nation. This film is  as well as  celebrated fo   r its cinemetography, lighting and set design (rather than its historical accuracy). What follows shall be a comparison of two specific  dates, one from   apiece(prenominal) film. I shall  recognise each  so explain how the elements mentioned  earliest  be   superposable in each and how they relate to their characters symbollically and their  several(prenominal) films as a whole.               The story of Charles Foster Kane unravels in a series of flashbacks told to a reporter by the   wad who knew him. In the films fourth flashback, Kanes second married woman, Susan, recounts her  career with Kane to the reporter, Thompson. The  attestator has learned  previous in the film that Kane has failed as a publisher, politician and as a husband to his  prime(prenominal) wife Emily. Kane puts all his hopes and aspirations into promoting Susans  opera carreer. The untalented Susan fails miserably and attempts suicide. The following sequence  occurs  later Kane tells Susan she can     end singing:                A  contr!   aband and  swart night- scissure of Kanes estate, Xanadu, fades in with a mansion high on a hill. The  mutable dissolves to a  close-set(prenominal),  besides equally  puritanic,  out-of-door of the mansion.  twain shots are  come with by eerie brass  medicinal drug building to a slow haunting crescendo. The mansion dissolves into a close-up of Susans  establishment and  tump over over a  saber  truism puzzle.                What are you doing? Kanes voice  surrounds as if in a   shameful cavern. The  camera pulls back to the  castigate,  legato on Susan as she reacts by  spirit left  take out screen. The scene cuts to a   sibyllinely focus shot of Kane  locomote through a fifteen-foot archway, half-lit/half in shadows. Kane tiny in the  priming  downstairs the archway, is dwarfed by the giant statues in the foreground, middle-ground and background as well.  jigsaw puzzles? Kane answers his own question with the same deep  phoneing voice. The sequence cuts back to Susan  ses   sion at the tabled jigsaw puzzle,  unflustered looking offscreen. She drops a piece of the puzzle, sighs  thusly  hold her head in  excrete seemingly in despair.                Charlie? What  cartridge holder is it? The shot reverses to Kane approaching. He is almost entirely shadowed in darkness.                football team thirty. Kane replies. Still walking, Kane turns to his left. The camera pans right, following him.                In  impudent York?  Susan asks.                Hmm..? Kane asks not hearing.                What time is it in  new-fashioned York? she asks impatiently.                Eleven thirty, he repeats. Kane continues crosswise the room still engulfed in darkness. As the camera pans right,  to a greater extent of the rooms immense grandeur is revealed. A    coarse  staircase  leaders to a large second story balcony, to a greater extent giant statues and the grandest of fireplaces fill the palatial hall. Kane    and Susan continue their conversation as Kane stops b!   eside Susan seated in front of the fireplace. Susans voice takes on a sarcastic then p leaders tone as she tells Kane she is bored, then begs him for a  faux pas to New York to have  roughly fun. Kane walks to the fire place, turns to  instance  superficial in a  military strength of stolid resolve.                Our  habitation is here Susan. I dont care to  take to task New York.                This sequence is highly symbolic and significant to the films narrative. The exterior establishing shot is dark and gloomy. Welles   stimulate forths an almost haunted   theatre of operations of operations  matter. This is Kanes home. It reflects Kanes own dark and sombre mood at this  battery-acid in the film. Kane has failed miserably at all attempts to bring happines to his life.  intimate the mansion Kane is dwarfed by Welles giant set pieces. By lighting the colossal statues and fixtures from behind and not lighting Kanes  pillow slip, he is cast almost entirely in dar   kness Kane is literally and symbolically overshadowed by Xanadu. This place he has built stands as a greater monument to his life than do his  actual acheivments. The deep focus shot in this scene helps to  bombination off symbollically  Kanes  superlative at this point of the film .  before in the film Welles shot himself from the  base of operations level /up to create Kanes powerful imposing stature. He even had to remove sections of floor to accomodate the camera and had to create  ca controvertals for the scenes in the newspapers office where they could be seen. It  shake up Kane appear  large than life. In the Xanadu scene Kane appears tiny in the background. He has  anomic any power he once had; power  in the publishing business, political power and the power to be happy. This deep focus shot also creates a seemingly vast distance between Kane and Susan onscreen. It is symbollic of their marriage. They have  grown distant from one another after their shared  existence failure   .  There is an  atmosphere of  lonelyness shared by t!   hese two characters,  sprightliness in this  wide dark palace with these imposing statues, where foot move echo and voices boom.                The grand palacial interior of Xanadu resembles greatly the interior of the  Empress palace in The Scarlet Empress. Sophia Frederica is summoned from Prussia to the Kremelin by the Russian Empress Catherine. She is to be the bride of the Empress nephew and heir Peter. The Empress   scout brings her to Russia by horse-carriage and sled-carriage. This sequence begins at the long journeys end with the horsemen leading the sled-carriage into the palace through a series of  enormous thirty-foot doors   undefendable by guards. Bells are chiming and the scene fades  to a close-up of a huge ornate church bell. The chiming fades replaced by regal trumpets as the scene cuts to a medium distance shot of the Empress  sitting on her  feces. Its a striking shot, as the  enthrone itself is massive. It is in fact a giant sculpture of a two-headed ea   gle. It is   exclusively symbollic of the Empress great power. Its  immense size demands the attention of the room and the  knockout of the film. The camera (likely on a crane) pulls back to reveal  more of the huge room. The throne is atop a grand staircase,  confusable to the one in Welless Xanadu.

 There are smaller   entirely equally ornate chairs on either side of the throne for her advisors and many large gruesome looking statues and  stone pit ceiling fixtures throughout the room. Not unlike Xanadu, the place has a very cold and dreary atmosphere. It reflects the psyche of the Empress who is herself cold and  lack compassion. She is a powerful woman, both  frank and ruthless. This is    ascertained right from when we first here her speak. !   The Empress walks forward down the massive  go as the envoi and Sophia and her mother approach. The scene cuts to a closer and lower,  untrimmed shot of the Empress at the foot of the stairs. Her advisor is   domiciliate to her right. The envoy bows and kisses the Empress hand. Welcome home your Excellency we missed you. she says to him as he bows the she kisses him on the mouth. He  travel aside as Sophia steps forward and bows. So this is little Sophie. says the Empress as she places a hand on each of Sophias shoulders and pulls her up. Sophia Frederica...hardly a name for a  future tense empress. You dont like your name do you? still holding her shoulders.                I do your Imperial Majesty she replies.                You will be called Catherine Alexina, a good Russian name. Weve arranged a special  honoring next week to receive you into our church... The Empress then congratulates Sophias (from here on known as Catherine) mother on raising a beautiful chi   ld. As the newly christened Catherine steps aside to make room for her mother, the camera cuts to a close-up of her face. Von Sternberg has a key light obviously pointed right at her face which gives her an angelic  bore amidst her dreary surroundings. It serves the opposite purpose of Welles casting Kanes face in shadow in the Xanadu scene. Welles villifies his protagonist where Von Sternberg casts Marlene Deitrich in an almost saintly light. Her beautiful face is practically glowing. This helps to convey the innocence and awe of the character. The young Catherine is  flighty to meet her husband and asks to meet him. He enters but has the  visual aspect of a  ill-shapen imbecile. He stands next to the young Catherine who appears  alienated and dissapoined. She is still  light by the key light  date the Duke , though standing right next to her is not illuminated. The  lay out created foreshadows the events of the film. She appears good and  virginal in her saintly light  charm he is    the dark and evil Duke. Young Catherine retires to h!   er chambers where she finds herself  surround by more huge gargoyle-like statues countless ladies in  wait cold stone fixtures and huge doors that require several people to open them. Catherine is overwhelmed by her surroundings and her circumstances. She has been stripped of her name and her  morality she is far from her home and she is betrothed to a hideous imbecile. Her dreary surroundings  only when add to her feelings of despair.                Both Orson Welles and Josef Von Sternberg use set design framing and lighting to great effect in the two aforementioned films. I realize that in the space provided I have only described breifly instances of this in each film, but the scenes I have chosen are central to each fim and give good example of how their  individual(a) techniques comment on the psychology of their principle characters.                                        If you want to  pretend a  broad(a) essay, order it on our website: 
OrderEssay.netIf you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: 
write my essay  
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.