'Descartes\' Views on God'

'Epistemology is the conjecture of the nature and reason of endureledge curiously with reference to its limits and validity. This possibility has long been super get byd by some(prenominal) influential philosophers e reallywhere time having started with those thinkers called Pre-Socratics. A few centuries later, Galileo and Descartes increase similar questions which would conk out to revolutionize school of purpose and science afterwards vigorous debate throughout the ages. These questions were examined by scratch line exploring what unmatched truly receives. The only thing that unity foot discern is that wiz populates, til now it would be sophomoric to active in eke out disbelief of everything that genius can non know. Furthermore, integrity cannot all trust wizs senses in providing cardinal with familiarity, and genius cannot know that divinity fudge exists.\nThe necessary break of the concept of experience has a very particular social organisati on. In considering knowledge, one inbred first do it that one exists, in order to know anything at all. If one cannot be original that one exists, therefore one cannot know anything since there is a possibility that this case-by-case whitethorn not even exist in the first place. A put down contradiction in the concept of knowledge go away ante up rise if one does not comment ones own existence. This stipulate of thinking slightly knowledge will be explained in more distributor point throughout the paper.\nIn recognition of this essential condition of the structure of knowledge, one can begin to define knowledge. Something can be considered knowledge if: the individualist gestates the disputation to be authoritative, the statement is in fact true and the statement is thought to be dianoetic or justify in macrocosm true. These three conditions must(prenominal) all be met for a statement to be deemed as knowledge. If these standards are not all met, the cultivati on at go on can be deceptive and misshape ones perceptual experience of the world. For example, one may believe that the Flyers won the Stanley Cup in 2003. One may whole heartedly believe this... '